|
|
|
|
USEPA
Issues New Air Regulations for Oil and Gas
Industry
On
April 17, 2012, the United States Environmental
Protection Agency ("USEPA") finalized its
long-anticipated updated New Source Performance
Standards ("NSPS") and National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
("NESHAP") for the oil and gas sector, which
include first-time federal air standards for
hydraulically fractured natural gas wells. This
suite of regulations, issued under the federal
Clean Air Act, was finalized pursuant to a
Consent Decree entered by the D.C. District
Court in conjunction with a lawsuit filed
against USEPA in January 2009 by WildEarth
Guardians and the San Juan Citizens Alliance.
The rules will be published in the Federal
Register in the coming weeks, and will take
effect 60 days following
publication. Perhaps most significantly,
the new rule package ultimately requires owners
and operators of natural gas wells that are
hydraulically fractured to reduce emissions of
volatile organic compounds ("VOCs") during well
completion operations through the use of reduced
emissions completions ("RECs" or "green
completions"). For purposes of the new
regulations, "reduced emission completion" is
defined as "well completion following fracturing
or refracturing where gas flowback that is
otherwise vented is captured, cleaned, and
routed to the flow line or collection system,
re-injected to the well or another well, used as
an on-site fuel source, or used for other useful
purpose that a purchased fuel or raw material
would serve, with no direct release to the
atmosphere." Green completions are not required
for new exploratory wells or delineation wells,
or for hydraulically fractured "low pressure"
gas wells, which instead must capture and direct
flowback emissions to a completion combustion
device. In response to comments from the
industry, USEPA has established a two-phased
approach to implementing this requirement to
allow sufficient time for the order and
manufacture of the necessary REC equipment.
During the initial phase, which lasts until
January 1, 2015, owners and operators can elect
to reduce VOC emissions by flaring using a
completion combustion device that burns off the
gas that would otherwise escape as an
alternative to RECs, unless state or local
requirements prohibit such combustion or
combustion would be a safety hazard. Owners and
operators who pursue this option remain subject
to "a general duty to safely maximize resource
recovery and minimize releases to the atmosphere
during flowback and subsequent recovery." The
second (and final) phase begins on January 1,
2015, at which point owners and operators must
achieve VOC emissions reductions through RECs.
To encourage the use of green completions
earlier than required, the new rules provide
that refractured and recompleted natural gas
wells will not be considered "modified"-and
therefore will not be considered affected
facilities-if well owners and operators use RECs
rather than flaring to reduce emissions
following such refracturing, as long as the
advance notification, recordkeeping and annual
reporting requirements for new wells are met. In
justifying this exemption in the Preamble to the
final rule, USEPA reasons that the increase in
emissions from natural gas wells that have
implemented these controls will be de
minimis.
Read
the full article on ou r website.
| |
|
| |
|
Pa.
Supreme Court Endorses Subjective Test in
Jedlicka
by
Kevin M. Eddy
Pittsburgh
On
March 26, 2012, in T.W. Phillips v.
Jedlicka, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
affirmed the test for determining whether an oil
and gas lease has produced in paying quantities
depends on the operator's good faith judgment and
endorsed the subjective test over the objective
test. The Supreme Court confirmed that
Pennsylvania courts must consider and analyze the
operator's subjective good-faith judgment in
maintaining operation of the well to determine
whether a well is producing "in paying
quantities." The lawsuit stems from a 1928
lease of oil and gas rights in a 163-acre tract in
Indiana County, Pennsylvania. The term of the
lease was for "two years, and as long thereafter
as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities."
Over the years, the parcel was subdivided and Ann
Jedlicka eventually owned 70 acres. Her parcel
contained a well that was drilled in 1929. In
2004, T.W. Phillips assigned the leasehold to
co-defendant PC Exploration, Inc., who drilled
four more wells on Ms. Jedlicka's property and
planned to drill four more.
Read
the full article on our website. |
Update
on Pa. Municipality
Act
13 Lawsuit
by
Michael G.
Connelly
Pittsburgh
As
reported in our March update, seven Pennsylvania
municipalities filed suit in the Commonwealth
Court on March 29, 2012, challenging the provision
of Act 13 providing that state law preempts the
local regulation of natural gas drilling by
municipalities and townships. After an initial
hearing on the lawsuit on April 11, 2012,
Commonwealth Court Judge Keith Quigley ordered a 120-day stay of the
enforcement of the provision regarding local
regulation of natural gas drilling. The Court held
that, to the extent that Chapter 33 of Act 13 may
be interpreted to immediately preempt pre-existing
local ordinances, a preliminary injunction was
issued to prevent enactment of that provision of
Act 13 pending further order of Court.
Read
the full article on our website.
|
Morgantown,
W.Va. Works Around Fracking Ban
Overturn
As
mentioned in previous newsletters, Spilman led the
charge in August 2011 to overturn a fracking ban
enacted by the city council of Morgantown, W.Va.
With the ban successfully overturned, the city
turned to a zoning approach to regulate extractive
industry land use, despite the state's passage of
The Natural Gas Horizontal Well Control Act this
past December.
| | | |
Featured
Shale Team Member
J.C.
"Max" Wilkinson (Charleston, W.Va.)
Max
has 15 years of experience primarily in energy sector
enforcement, litigation and permitting. He served as Corporate
Counsel for ICG, LLC and was counsel to the Virginia
Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy's Division of Mined
Land Reclamation while serving as an Assistant Attorney
General. Max has extensive experience in energy industry
environmental issues from both a private sector and regulatory
perspective. Click here to
read his full professional biography.
|
This is an attorney advertisement. Your receipt
and/ or use of this material does not constitute or create an
attorney-client relationship between you and Spilman Thomas
& Battle, PLLC or any attorney associated with the firm.
This e-mail publication is distributed with the understanding
that the author, publisher and distributor are not rendering
legal or other professional advice on specific facts or
matters and, accordingly, assume no liability whatsoever in
connection with its use.
| | |