Welcome to the third issue of SuperVision for 2022. Before turning to the topics covered in this edition, we have a number of important and exciting announcements!
First, we want to congratulate Eric Kinder for his selection as the 2022 recipient of the DRI Albert H. Parnell Outstanding Program Chair Award for his leadership role in developing DRI’s 45th annual Labor & Employment Law Seminar. This award honors one individual who created a dynamic educational program enhancing DRI’s image, and who further has led and participated in effective planning, marketing, and presentation of the educational program. Please join us in applauding Eric for all of his efforts.
Finally, Spilman is pleased to announce its sponsorship of the American Bar Association's 16th Annual Labor and Employment Conference behind held in Washington, D.C. from November 9-12, 2022. We would love to see you there! You can learn more about this always important conference here.
This issue of SuperVision covers a variety of topics, some of which are breaking news, including the National Labor’s Relations Board’s newly published notice of proposed rule on joint employment and the recent ruling from the Fourth Circuit recognizing gender dysphoria as a disability under the ADA. We also provide guidance on ERISA health plans in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the need to update employee handbooks to recognize the emergence of remote work, and how to handle harassment by non-employees impacting your workplace.
We hope you enjoy this issue and find the topics interesting! As always, feel free to contact us with your feedback or if there is a particular topic you would like us to cover.
|
|
The NLRB Proposes to Re-Re-Revise Its Joint Employer Standard
|
|
On September 6, 2022, the National Labor Relations Board issued a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the standard for determining joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. The rule as proposed would effectively overturn a rule on the same subject issued just over two years ago during the Trump administration.
Click here to read the entire article.
|
|
The Impact of Overturning Roe v. Wade on ERISA Benefit Plans
|
|
In late June 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had previously recognized a woman’s constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability. After Dobbs, many states sought to protect a woman’s choice to terminate her pregnancy. Other states, however, had laws that automatically went into effect to restrict or ban abortions within their jurisdiction or, like West Virginia, began debating whether and to what extent to restrict or ban abortions.
For employers who offer reproductive health benefits through their employee benefit plans, laws restricting abortion raise questions about health care coverage and whether employers must make changes to their benefit plans to ensure continued access and compliance with the law in the different jurisdictions where they may operate. We discuss the top three questions we have heard (and answered).
Click here to read the entire article.
|
|
Federal Circuit Court Holds that Gender Dysphoria is a Protected Disability Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
|
|
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Maryland) held that gender dysphoria, a condition experienced by some transgender individuals, is a protected disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. See Williams v. Kincaid, No. 21-2030 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2022). This ruling extends the protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act, such as the right to a reasonable accommodation, to individuals with gender dysphoria.
Click here to read the entire article.
|
|
Avoiding the Latest Handbook Traps for the Unwary in the Age of Remote Work
|
|
Most employers know their employee handbooks need to be living documents that are reviewed and updated when conditions change. If any employer doubted the need for doing this, the past two years should have convinced them otherwise – with the need to incorporate policies to address statutorily mandated COVID-19 sick leave and/or vaccinations. While many of the mandatory COVID-19 sick leave policies are sunsetting, the sun is just rising for remote work issues. Indeed, employee handbooks are often more vital in the remote work setting since a remote worker cannot walk down the hall and ask HR questions.
Click here to read the entire article.
|
|
Third Party Harassment Claims: When the Customer is Wrong
|
|
Most employers know that they have a legal obligation to protect employees from harassment at work and to prevent it from recurring. Many employers assume that this obligation relates to harassment by employees and managers; however, it actually extends to harassment by third parties, including customers or vendors. Several recent cases brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reinforce the concept that employers can be liable for the harassing conduct of third parties if the employer knew or should have known of the conduct and failed to take timely remedial measures.
Click here to read the entire article.
|
|
This is an attorney advertisement. Your receipt and/or use of this material does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between you and Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC or any attorney associated with the firm. This e-mail publication is distributed with the understanding that the author, publisher and distributor are not rendering legal or other professional advice on specific facts or matters and, accordingly, assume no liability whatsoever in connection with its use.
Responsible Attorney: Eric W. Iskra, 800-967-8251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|